FEIGN 发表于 2025-3-23 13:09:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_11.png亚当心理阴影 发表于 2025-3-23 14:50:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_12.png初次登台 发表于 2025-3-23 20:23:26
Swayam Sampurna Panigrahi,Deepti Chandrathe other, the symbolic, the real, and the phallus help us understand how the issue of sexual difference is bound up with this world of shared meaning. In particular, Lacan seems to exclude women or the feminine from the symbolic and indicates that a positive relation between the sexes is impossibleCLOT 发表于 2025-3-24 01:25:50
N. V. Subbarao,Bindu Chhabra,Manit Mishrae Jacques Lacan, language is an event that exceeds the human sphere. Further, I suggest that language, for Heidegger, is an event that calls upon humanity to attune itself to the structures that condition our existence and to formulate a response through speech. I show how Luce Irigaray inherits Hei阻止 发表于 2025-3-24 05:24:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_15.pngResign 发表于 2025-3-24 10:36:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09539-0upon different others in order to grow and establish its embodied place in the world. I analyze common features seen in cases of domestic violence, suggesting that they are at least in part a result of an underlying denial of woman’s place: a result of the underlying refusal of a relation to alterit谎言 发表于 2025-3-24 14:15:17
exuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings.. .This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem978-3-031-19307-1978-3-031-19305-7conduct 发表于 2025-3-24 17:10:40
Book 2023ially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings.. .This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem未完成 发表于 2025-3-24 19:41:08
Book 2023lies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis..By tracing the notion of .relation. throughout Irigaray’s work, this b柔美流畅 发表于 2025-3-25 00:32:44
itance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological.IdeMany scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, t