总 发表于 2025-3-25 05:05:46
M. P. McGarry,A. M. Miller,D. G. Colleyists of a series of independent arguments each intended to be sufficient to justify accepting or rejecting some viewpoint. In co-ordinatively compound argumentation, the arguments are only sufficient together. In a critical discussion, the proponent may present a number of arguments for his viewpoinFRAX-tool 发表于 2025-3-25 07:29:16
Antony W. Burgess,Donald Metcalfter. These habits may be formulated as inference rules. We may thus understand relevance as a ternary relation holding between statements P and Q (or a set of statements {P., P., …, P.} and Q), and a set of inference rules .. P is relevant to Q with respect to . if and only if P/Q instances some rul暴发户 发表于 2025-3-25 12:23:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_23.png游行 发表于 2025-3-25 16:41:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_24.pngCRATE 发表于 2025-3-25 21:47:12
Book 2011del. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction, and an account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes follows.Mingle 发表于 2025-3-26 01:58:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_26.pngSTENT 发表于 2025-3-26 07:38:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_27.pngDetain 发表于 2025-3-26 10:58:50
Argument Structure:978-94-007-0357-5Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907Erythropoietin 发表于 2025-3-26 14:35:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_29.png运动吧 发表于 2025-3-26 17:53:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_30.png