Increment 发表于 2025-3-23 11:25:47
Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent Versus Multiple-Co-ordinativl evaluation of arguments. If one convergent premise is unacceptable, the remaining premises may still be acceptable and adequate grounds for the conclusion. But if a linked premise is unacceptable, the entire reason of which it is a factor is unacceptable. Keeping these two pairs of distinctions seIncorporate 发表于 2025-3-23 17:14:04
,The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion,ion for making the linked-convergent distinction. We criticize a number of tests for making the distinction as involving counterintuitive or anomalous results because they apply semantic considerations to do a syntactic job. We argue that recognizing that premises may function as counter-defeaters iErgots 发表于 2025-3-23 19:03:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_13.png阴郁 发表于 2025-3-23 22:24:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_14.png四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-24 05:29:03
James B. FreemanComprehensive dialectical theory representing argument structures incorporating Toulmin model insights.Defends the linked-convergent distinction in depth, responding to virtually all recent critics in设想 发表于 2025-3-24 08:29:12
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161522.jpgOdyssey 发表于 2025-3-24 13:00:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-77922-3circles and arrows due to Beardsley and Thomas from Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Although Thomas has shown how the standard approach may accommodate arguments with suppositions, representing the structure of arguments replying to objections needs extension of the method through incorporating eleme故意钓到白杨 发表于 2025-3-24 14:56:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_18.pngGRIEF 发表于 2025-3-24 23:01:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_19.png暂时别动 发表于 2025-3-25 03:02:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_20.png