Increment 发表于 2025-3-23 11:25:47

Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent Versus Multiple-Co-ordinativl evaluation of arguments. If one convergent premise is unacceptable, the remaining premises may still be acceptable and adequate grounds for the conclusion. But if a linked premise is unacceptable, the entire reason of which it is a factor is unacceptable. Keeping these two pairs of distinctions se

Incorporate 发表于 2025-3-23 17:14:04

,The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion,ion for making the linked-convergent distinction. We criticize a number of tests for making the distinction as involving counterintuitive or anomalous results because they apply semantic considerations to do a syntactic job. We argue that recognizing that premises may function as counter-defeaters i

Ergots 发表于 2025-3-23 19:03:02

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_13.png

阴郁 发表于 2025-3-23 22:24:14

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_14.png

四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-24 05:29:03

James B. FreemanComprehensive dialectical theory representing argument structures incorporating Toulmin model insights.Defends the linked-convergent distinction in depth, responding to virtually all recent critics in

设想 发表于 2025-3-24 08:29:12

Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161522.jpg

Odyssey 发表于 2025-3-24 13:00:09

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-77922-3circles and arrows due to Beardsley and Thomas from Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Although Thomas has shown how the standard approach may accommodate arguments with suppositions, representing the structure of arguments replying to objections needs extension of the method through incorporating eleme

故意钓到白杨 发表于 2025-3-24 14:56:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_18.png

GRIEF 发表于 2025-3-24 23:01:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_19.png

暂时别动 发表于 2025-3-25 03:02:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161522/161522_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Argument Structure:; Representation and T James B. Freeman Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argument.Argument Diagrammin