Anguish
发表于 2025-3-28 14:58:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_41.png
护身符
发表于 2025-3-28 21:39:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_42.png
有机体
发表于 2025-3-29 02:44:48
Amending the Unamendable: The Case of Article 20 of the German Basic Lawan the derived one which has only the right to amend an existing constitution in the framework allowed by the original one. In other words, parliaments who want to amend the constitutions are limited by the unamendable provisions. In 1968, Parliament of Germany added the 4th paragraph (which provide
esthetician
发表于 2025-3-29 03:45:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_44.png
Bumble
发表于 2025-3-29 09:08:13
The Unamendability of Amendable Clauses: The Case of the Turkish Constitutiondments under three different constitutional settings, striking down amendments to the normally amendable provisions of the Turkish constitution. In doing so, it relied upon the unamendability clauses. The Court created an intra-constitutional hierarchy based on the unamendable clauses and exercised
Ballad
发表于 2025-3-29 12:42:00
Brazil in the Context of the Debate Over Unamendability in Latin Americanal replacements has waned in the last years, Latin America has long been portrayed as the region where changing the constitution is a common pattern. This paper will explore how this debate has taken place in Brazil, a major player in Latin America whose constitutionalism has been rather underexplo
江湖郎中
发表于 2025-3-29 16:54:57
Unamendable Constitutional Provisions and the European Common Constitutional Heritage: A Comparison age, which is a common set of values defined through their constitutional evolution and thanks to the role played by supranational regional organizations, such as the Council of Europe (CoE) and the European Union (EU). This essay discusses the interplay between said common heritage and the unamenda
关心
发表于 2025-3-29 22:20:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_48.png
借喻
发表于 2025-3-30 02:37:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_49.png
隐语
发表于 2025-3-30 07:15:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-37943-1. By considerably extending the contours of the basic structure doctrine, the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in the Fourth Judges Case exacerbates the potential for these falsehoods. This chapter considers how these falsehoods have arisen, the attempts to redress them, and what they mean for constitutional interpretation outside of the courts.