痛打
发表于 2025-3-30 10:54:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_51.png
AGGER
发表于 2025-3-30 16:12:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_52.png
殖民地
发表于 2025-3-30 19:03:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1558/155702/155702_53.png
植物茂盛
发表于 2025-3-30 23:35:19
Constitutional Falsehoods: The Fourth Judges Case and the Basic Structure Doctrine in India. By considerably extending the contours of the basic structure doctrine, the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in the Fourth Judges Case exacerbates the potential for these falsehoods. This chapter considers how these falsehoods have arisen, the attempts to redress them, and what they mean for constitutional interpretation outside of the courts.
Brain-Waves
发表于 2025-3-31 02:02:39
Amending the Unamendable: The Case of Article 20 of the German Basic Law Article 79 of the Basic Law of Germany during the drafting process in 1949. Consequently, although this newly added paragraph is present in an unamendable article, any derived . can amend, change or annul it because it is not approved by an original