Intractable
发表于 2025-3-25 05:53:54
,Functions: The Göttingen School and the Physiology of Vital Forces, and naturalists gathered under the category of the “Göttingen School,” namely Albrecht von Haller (1708–1777), Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840), Carl Friedrich Kielmeyer (1765–1844), and Heinrich Friedrich Link (1767–1851). I argue that the theoretical framework of the Göttingen School impli
过多
发表于 2025-3-25 09:46:28
Classification: , and the Reform of Natural History,he (1749–1832), Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (1775–1854), and Lorenz Oken (1779–1851). This chapter is organized as a counterargument to Peter Hanns Reill’s stark distinction between “Enlightenment Vitalism” and “Romantic ..” I will demonstrate that, although a difference can be identified bet
AVOW
发表于 2025-3-25 13:23:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_23.png
OTHER
发表于 2025-3-25 17:18:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_24.png
Memorial
发表于 2025-3-25 20:51:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_25.png
辩论
发表于 2025-3-26 00:47:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_26.png
insurgent
发表于 2025-3-26 04:56:04
,Functions: The Göttingen School and the Physiology of Vital Forces,ed two fundamental tenets: first, an interpretation of teleology as internal purposiveness (argued by Blumenbach), and second, a proposal to reform natural history in terms of comparative physiology, i.e. as a taxonomy of vital functions and an analysis of their distribution in the animal and plant kingdoms (articulated by Kielmeyer and Link).
Urologist
发表于 2025-3-26 11:33:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_28.png
皮萨
发表于 2025-3-26 13:06:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9840/983922/983922_29.png
BROW
发表于 2025-3-26 19:45:27
Conclusion: Hegel on Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization, for its speculative excesses. These critiques, however, establish that Hegel did not consider . something to be thoroughly rejected, but corrected and integrated. His attempt to facilitate this integration resulted in a theory of biological individuality in which teleology is understood as . purposiveness, i.e. autonomous self-organization.