Affable 发表于 2025-3-25 05:15:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_21.pngInoperable 发表于 2025-3-25 09:25:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_22.pngCURL 发表于 2025-3-25 12:02:59
Textbook 1995Latest editionon the discipline and practice of art history. Centring on the intersection of questions of vision with the problematic of textuality, the book addresses how issues of politics, semiotics, psychoanalysis and historiography have contributed to the emergent terms and practices of the new art histories.reject 发表于 2025-3-25 18:51:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_24.pnginfringe 发表于 2025-3-25 22:04:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_25.png进步 发表于 2025-3-26 03:16:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_26.png发展 发表于 2025-3-26 05:53:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_27.png虚度 发表于 2025-3-26 12:30:42
General Introductionring the winter and spring of 1991. Funding for the series was the now-standard patchwork, with crucial initial support coming from the Kress Foundation and the Department of English, with further support coming from the Ray Smith Endowment in the Humanities, administered by the College of Arts andreperfusion 发表于 2025-3-26 14:17:34
Basic Concepts. Of Art Historyns. The senses assigned both these phrases have been highly various: for some ‘the new art history’ is a new or renewed social history of art;. for others, the phrase evokes a new semiotic ground for the discipline;. still others may hear in it a call for a post-structuralist art history, or for an丰富 发表于 2025-3-26 19:45:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9837/983614/983614_30.png