indubitable 发表于 2025-3-30 10:58:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_51.pngHACK 发表于 2025-3-30 15:48:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_52.png音乐会 发表于 2025-3-30 20:00:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_53.png坦白 发表于 2025-3-30 23:25:05
Fuzzy Preferences as a Convenient Tool in Group Decision Making and a Remedy for Voting Paradoxes,s and make models more realistic. Then, we will briefly present some tools to be used, notably how to deal with linguistically quantified statements, and with a linguistic quantifier driven aggregation.灰姑娘 发表于 2025-3-31 04:36:34
What We Are Learning from Neurosciences about Decision-Making: A Quest for Fuzzy Set Technology,ox and Poldrack, 2005) suggested that people do not evaluate options by their objective value but rather by their utility and conjectured that appropriate choices are those for which the expected utility is maximum. Bernoulli also argued that utility functions should to be a concave function becauseironic 发表于 2025-3-31 07:55:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_56.pngSpinous-Process 发表于 2025-3-31 12:44:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_57.png向外供接触 发表于 2025-3-31 14:34:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_58.pngperiodontitis 发表于 2025-3-31 20:41:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9831/983071/983071_59.png丧失 发表于 2025-4-1 00:42:16
Fuzzy Logic and Science,guous criteria, trying below in such a note to illuminate as editors potential authors of . journal with . their decisions. Should we think then that scientists can take advantage of some kind of “fuzzy logic”, in order to evaluate the quality of a scientific paper, but such a logic can not be part of such a scientific paper?