HAG
发表于 2025-3-21 17:48:48
书目名称Universalizability影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Universalizability读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0942246<br><br> <br><br>
恫吓
发表于 2025-3-21 21:28:40
Theory of Automorphismsn individual, then by . we shall understand the set of all worlds in which a exists, i.e., {.∈.: .∈.}. Letters ., ., ., .,… shall stand for individuals (=members of .), and we shall refer to the members of A as ., ., .,….
脱落
发表于 2025-3-22 04:03:48
Introductionrtain situation, ., it ought to be the case that certain goods are transferred from one person to another, then this moral obligation does not depend on the individual identities of the persons involved.
DOTE
发表于 2025-3-22 07:12:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9423/942246/942246_4.png
放肆的你
发表于 2025-3-22 12:22:55
Theory of Automorphismsst in ., and the set A of automorphisms. We shall write ‘.w’ sinstead of ‘.(w)’ and we shall often use the symbol ‘.’ in order to refer to the set of all individuals which exist in one world or another. Thus, ‘.’ shall frequently represent the union of all values of the existence-function. If . is a
斜谷
发表于 2025-3-22 13:58:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9423/942246/942246_6.png
合法
发表于 2025-3-22 20:35:57
Universality and Universalizability.}.) Thus, the deontic closure of . is the proposition true in exactly those worlds in which . is obligatory. In other words, the deontic closure of . is nothing other than the proposition that . is obligatory.
笼子
发表于 2025-3-22 23:08:09
Extensions of Leibnizianism . to .. Such a reduction must consist in the derivation of the condition (.), according to which . includes .. This is sufficient, because the converse of this condition trivially follows from any variant of D 10.3. Before we start searching for such extensions of Leibnizianism, let us recall that
genesis
发表于 2025-3-23 05:11:26
Leibnizianism Once Againin a situation can never be replaced without changing some of the universal aspects of the situation. Leibnizianism amounts to the claim that individual differences between situations always imply some universal differences. To put it formally, for any ., .∊., and any individual .⊆. such that .∊. an
多产子
发表于 2025-3-23 06:45:29
Book 1979ll understand it, this principle represents a claim that moral properties of things (persons, actions, state of affairs, situations) are essentially independent of their purely ‘individual‘ or-as one often says -‘numerical‘ aspects. l Thus, if a thing, x, is better than another thing, y, then this f