皮萨
发表于 2025-3-30 09:27:57
L. Hart,I. N. Azcárate,J. C. Cersosimo,F. R. Colombve appeared in recent years (e. g. Wrege, C. & R. Greenwood, 1991 "F. W. Taylor: The father of scientific management", Business One Irwin, Homewood IL; Nelson, D. (Ed. ) 1992 "The mental revolution: Scientific management since Taylor", Ohio State University Press, Columbus OH). We know other books a
ingestion
发表于 2025-3-30 15:45:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882701/882701_52.png
Adulterate
发表于 2025-3-30 18:53:51
W. Hermsen,J. B. G. M. Bloemen the other way round. Therefore we cannot accept either the empiricist or the nominalist reduction (elimination) of conceptual objects any more than we can admit the idealist claim that they are ideal beings with an autonomous existence. We must look for an alternative consistent with both ontologic
鸽子
发表于 2025-3-30 23:34:53
François Lebrun the other way round. Therefore we cannot accept either the empiricist or the nominalist reduction (elimination) of conceptual objects any more than we can admit the idealist claim that they are ideal beings with an autonomous existence. We must look for an alternative consistent with both ontologic
肮脏
发表于 2025-3-31 01:31:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882701/882701_55.png
Melatonin
发表于 2025-3-31 07:06:33
J. B. G. M. Bloemen,L. Blitz,W. Hermsen the other way round. Therefore we cannot accept either the empiricist or the nominalist reduction (elimination) of conceptual objects any more than we can admit the idealist claim that they are ideal beings with an autonomous existence. We must look for an alternative consistent with both ontologic
防止
发表于 2025-3-31 09:34:29
A. W. Strongmaterialism, centered around Greek and Indian atomism. The second was the revival of the first during the 17th century. The third was 18th century ma terialism, partly derived from one side of Descartes‘ ambiguous legacy. The fourth was the mid-19th century "scientific" material ism, which flourished mainly978-94-009-8519-3978-94-009-8517-9
搬运工
发表于 2025-3-31 16:05:07
Frank N. Bash the other way round. Therefore we cannot accept either the empiricist or the nominalist reduction (elimination) of conceptual objects any more than we can admit the idealist claim that they are ideal beings with an autonomous existence. We must look for an alternative consistent with both ontologic
裙带关系
发表于 2025-3-31 19:53:01
F. J. Kerr the other way round. Therefore we cannot accept either the empiricist or the nominalist reduction (elimination) of conceptual objects any more than we can admit the idealist claim that they are ideal beings with an autonomous existence. We must look for an alternative consistent with both ontologic
Feigned
发表于 2025-3-31 23:02:06
Leo Blitzdented storm in the press, . . . such a book can be nothing ordinary; the world-calling it enjoys at present must be justified through its wholly special characteristics or by the merits of its form and content. ‘ Vogt, Moleschott and Buchner explicitly held that their materialism was founded on natural scien978-90-277-0763-5978-94-010-1173-0