RAG
发表于 2025-3-28 16:15:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8799/879834/879834_41.png
Forsake
发表于 2025-3-28 20:26:21
,Structural Models for Williamson’s Modal Epistemology,the cotenability problem and the gap problem. As I diagnose it, these problems somehow indicate that our standard way of understanding counterfactuals under the received possible-worlds semantics may have insufficient ‘structures’ to distinguish various different kinds of constraints on our counterf
IDEAS
发表于 2025-3-29 00:21:53
Motivating the Causal Modeling Semantics of Counterfactuals, or, Why We Should Favor the Causal Mod Stalnaker [.]. In this paper, I argue that, from the perspective of philosophical semantics, the causal modeling semantics proposed by Pearl [.] and others (e.g., Briggs [.]) is more plausible than the Lewis-Stalnaker possible-worlds semantics. I offer two reasons. First, the possible-worlds semant
叫喊
发表于 2025-3-29 04:02:42
The Meaning of Epistemic Modality and the Absence of Truth, ‘the keys might be in the drawer’ and ‘they might be in the car’ (Kamp, Proc Aristotelian Soc N S 74:57–74 (1973), [.]). Namely, ‘or’ behaves like a conjunction ‘and’ when it meets epistemic modality ‘might’. It has been noted that it is very difficult to explain this phenomenon in terms of convers
白杨
发表于 2025-3-29 08:20:43
Revising a Labelled Sequent Calculus for Public Announcement Logic,g an axiom of Hilbert-style axiomatization of PAL. Then, we provide our revised calculus . to show that all the formulas provable in Hilbert-style axiomatization of PAL are also provable in . together with the . rule. We also establish that our calculus enjoys cut elimination theorem. Moreover, we s
alcoholism
发表于 2025-3-29 14:49:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8799/879834/879834_46.png
暂时休息
发表于 2025-3-29 17:09:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8799/879834/879834_47.png
Chagrin
发表于 2025-3-29 20:41:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8799/879834/879834_48.png
Kindle
发表于 2025-3-30 01:13:02
Constructive Embedding from Extensions of Logics of Strict Implication into Modal Logics,al logics via labelled sequent calculi. Then, they regard a monotonicity of atomic propositions in intuitionistic logic as an initial sequent, i.e., an axiom. However, we regard the monotonicity as an additional inference rule and employ a modified translation sending an atomic variable . to . to ge
CRATE
发表于 2025-3-30 04:45:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8799/879834/879834_50.png