草率女 发表于 2025-3-25 03:44:28

From Defaults to Redemption: Mexico, 1821–1890exclusivity over Mexico’s debt. Yet the government refused to have a patron bank and issued a second loan through different underwriters in the following year. That enabled Mexican negotiators to bargain for cheap credit.

Noisome 发表于 2025-3-25 10:14:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_22.png

烦扰 发表于 2025-3-25 13:36:05

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_23.png

充满装饰 发表于 2025-3-25 19:00:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_24.png

Armory 发表于 2025-3-25 22:58:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_25.png

拍翅 发表于 2025-3-26 02:18:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_26.png

暗语 发表于 2025-3-26 05:08:20

Conclusionfered, but one conclusion holds: The governments acted as independent players, devising their approaches to underwriters based on country-specific payoffs. Whenever they could, high officials took advantage of their relative power over bankers to borrow cheaply.

并排上下 发表于 2025-3-26 11:36:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_28.png

禁止,切断 发表于 2025-3-26 16:43:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872209/872209_29.png

BLUSH 发表于 2025-3-26 17:25:26

Governments versus Bankers in the Pre-1914 Sovereign Debt Marketnds—and assumed that governments were passive when negotiating borrowing conditions. This chapter addresses the role of governments as independent decision-makers. Governments decided whether to grant exclusivity to a single patron bank or to negotiate with competing banks to reduce borrowing costs.
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Sovereign Debt Crises and Negotiations in Brazil and Mexico, 1888-1914; Governments versus B Leonardo Weller Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if ap