水土
发表于 2025-3-23 13:32:54
not true, let us say that that statement is possible a priori. And I shall say that a statement is knowable only a posteriori if the speaker is able to recognise its truth only on the basis of some observations he has made or of reports made to him by others of observations they have made. No doubt
pus840
发表于 2025-3-23 15:56:50
not true, let us say that that statement is possible a priori. And I shall say that a statement is knowable only a posteriori if the speaker is able to recognise its truth only on the basis of some observations he has made or of reports made to him by others of observations they have made. No doubt
形容词词尾
发表于 2025-3-23 20:18:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8688/868721/868721_13.png
机密
发表于 2025-3-23 22:34:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8688/868721/868721_14.png
熟练
发表于 2025-3-24 03:39:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8688/868721/868721_15.png
审问,审讯
发表于 2025-3-24 09:16:46
John P. Doran,Vladimir L. Uskovher in .. In this paper we construct a simple discriminator Δ ε Λ° such that: ...Note that in (1) and (4) the statement is only about closed lambda terms, while that in (2) and (3) is about all lambda terms. Moreover in (2) syntactic equality . terms is considered literary, while in (4) we can deal
CURL
发表于 2025-3-24 13:03:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8688/868721/868721_17.png
OWL
发表于 2025-3-24 18:31:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8688/868721/868721_18.png
cyanosis
发表于 2025-3-24 19:28:31
Daniel Moritz Marutschke,Victor V. Kryssanov,Patricia Brockmannllapse; that, in analogy with the classical case, each fuzzy .-c.e. set can be represented as a Boolean combination of fuzzy c.e. sets; but that, contrary to the classical case, the Fuzzy Ershov Hierarchy does not exhaust the class of all . fuzzy sets.
比目鱼
发表于 2025-3-25 02:46:53
Blake Wentz,Heather N. Yatesars ago by Nayak .. We establish that, for elementary revision operators and under mild assumptions regarding contraction, Nayak’s proposal is equivalent to a new set of postulates formalising the claim that contraction by . should be considered to be a kind of ‘mild’ revision by .. We then show tha