Awkward 发表于 2025-3-21 17:27:36

书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification网络公开度<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引频次<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引频次学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification读者反馈<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Seemings and Epistemic Justification读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0863788<br><br>        <br><br>

Harpoon 发表于 2025-3-21 21:41:41

Concluding Remarks,t that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if it were integrated with a theory of inferential justification. I also identify questions and issues relevant to the assessment of phenomenal conservatism to be investigated in further research.

改进 发表于 2025-3-22 01:43:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8638/863788/863788_3.png

expire 发表于 2025-3-22 08:24:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8638/863788/863788_4.png

Living-Will 发表于 2025-3-22 11:03:32

The Bayesian Objection,e with Bayesianism. I consider a few responses and dismiss them as misled or problematic. Then, I argue that the objection doesn’t go through because it rests on an implausible formalization of the notion of seeming-based justification. In the final part of the chapter, I investigate how seeming-bas

obstinate 发表于 2025-3-22 14:32:50

Antiscepticism and Easy Justification,can lose it simply by reflecting on her seemings. I argue that since seeming-based justification is elusive, the antisceptical bite of phenomenal conservatism is importantly limited. I also contend that since seeming-based justification has this feature, phenomenal conservatism isn’t actually afflic

Vldl379 发表于 2025-3-22 19:23:53

Concluding Remarks,y serious problems attributed to it by its opponents, but that it neither possesses all the epistemic merits that its advocates think it has. I suggest that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if

filicide 发表于 2025-3-22 22:35:31

2211-4548 omenal conservatism by rejecting apparently consolidated obj.This book examines phenomenal conservatism, one of the most influential and promising internalist conceptions of non-inferential justification debated in current epistemology and philosophy of mind. It also explores the significance of the

指耕作 发表于 2025-3-23 04:31:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8638/863788/863788_9.png

Acetabulum 发表于 2025-3-23 06:31:10

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8638/863788/863788_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Seemings and Epistemic Justification; How Appearances Just Luca Moretti Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature