可扩大
发表于 2025-3-21 18:34:08
书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0862788<br><br> <br><br>
苍白
发表于 2025-3-21 23:34:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862788/862788_2.png
gastritis
发表于 2025-3-22 00:40:38
978-90-481-8403-3Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984
NEG
发表于 2025-3-22 06:08:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862788/862788_4.png
finite
发表于 2025-3-22 12:29:44
1566-659X Overview: 978-90-481-8403-3978-94-015-7688-8Series ISSN 1566-659X Series E-ISSN 2215-1974
custody
发表于 2025-3-22 16:00:16
On the Sociology of Belief, Knowledge, and Science,ch to adopt. Whether or not it is worthwhile to do so in a particular instance depends upon the existence of considerable disagreement over sufficiently interesting or controversial ideas. I find the issues at hand to be both interesting and controversial.
Decimate
发表于 2025-3-22 18:33:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862788/862788_7.png
混合物
发表于 2025-3-22 22:27:21
Introduction: The Sociological Turn,mselves would have given to justify their theory choices? Perhaps we should be citing the “evidence” for the belief in question; perhaps we should be providing “good reasons” as part of the explanation for holding the belief. Which approach to understanding science is right?
偏见
发表于 2025-3-23 03:44:42
The Pseudo-Science of Science?,elf. The older sociological tradition, which tended to take a hands-off policy where ‘sound’ scientific belief was concerned, has been variously indicted by the new wave as lacking the courage of its convictions, treating science as ‘sacred’ and unimaginatively selling short the explanatory resources of a robust sociology of knowledge.
分期付款
发表于 2025-3-23 08:19:08
Two Historiographical Strategies: Ideas and Social Conditions in the History of Science,ould be largely a matter of relating scientific ideas to the social context in which they occur. Why is this? And what reasons do these “social historians” have for rejecting the older historiographical tradition?