温和女孩
发表于 2025-3-28 16:01:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862736/862736_41.png
敌手
发表于 2025-3-28 19:08:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862736/862736_42.png
arbiter
发表于 2025-3-28 23:38:47
The Rationality of Discovery,t this raises no problem, as the experts most closely related to the discovery in question can easily judge it. They do soon the strength of common theories of rationality. These are, first, that rationality equals algorism, and second, that it equals quasi-algorisms. Both these theories do untold d
Measured
发表于 2025-3-29 05:21:40
The Logic of Discovery: An Analysis of Three Approaches,is still controversial. Popper (1959), Hempel (1966), and Braithwaite (1955), for example, have categorically denied that anything like a logic of discovery is possible. On the other hand, the notion has been vigorously defended by C. S. Peirce and, more recently, by Hanson (1961), Achinstein (1970)
fulcrum
发表于 2025-3-29 09:22:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862736/862736_45.png
chastise
发表于 2025-3-29 13:53:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862736/862736_46.png
Creatinine-Test
发表于 2025-3-29 16:43:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862736/862736_47.png
声音刺耳
发表于 2025-3-29 20:09:45
The Role of Models in Theory Construction,tain kind. Part I presents an analysis of these problems and introduces terminology that facilitates an abstract treatment of the circumstances in which they arise. Part II describes a program of research suggested by these circumstances and incorporates its central features into an analysis of a sp
Evolve
发表于 2025-3-30 01:59:48
Can Scientific Constraints be Violated Rationally?, . — presupposes an elaborate theoretical background, and the constraints or conditions of adequacy on its solution are predominantly conceptual rather than empirical. The solutions to many conceptual problems are theories. In working out the solution to such a problem, a scientist is reasoning to a
Eeg332
发表于 2025-3-30 06:45:35
Why Philosophers should not Despair of Understanding Scientific Discovery,r reexamination, a topic on which twentieth century orthodoxies will, I believe, soon seem . out of date.. It holds forth a triple challenge — first, understanding why so many philosophers since Herschel and Whewell have though that there could not be . philosophical understanding of the process of