业余爱好者
发表于 2025-3-23 10:39:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8627/862623/862623_11.png
indicate
发表于 2025-3-23 14:45:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8627/862623/862623_12.png
Dorsal
发表于 2025-3-23 18:23:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8627/862623/862623_13.png
conceal
发表于 2025-3-23 22:26:50
Comments,Professor Braithwaite’s aim is to examine in a systematic way inferences which an observer, Karl, can make concerning Luke’s beliefs from information about Luke’s choices from among alternative courses of actions.
neolith
发表于 2025-3-24 03:22:23
Comments,I found this paper most stimulating and original and would like to make a few comments and ask a few questions. These comments and questions relate to the typed version of November 1, 1969, which I was privileged to read in advance of the lecture.
LEVY
发表于 2025-3-24 08:21:10
Open Action, Utility, and Utilitarianism,This essay is another installment in a continuing examination of the logical foundations of utilitarianism.. Here we discuss act-utilitarianism.
萤火虫
发表于 2025-3-24 10:58:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8627/862623/862623_17.png
斗争
发表于 2025-3-24 17:40:37
Reply to Professor Kyburg,ree! We mainly agree on the criticisms of my approach. One way out is through the concept of expected seriousness mentioned in several places in my paper, but not made part of the formal theory. There is a difficulty about this concept as well, but let me first sketch how the theory might be developed.
委派
发表于 2025-3-24 19:22:24
Measurement: A Systems Approach,le questioning whether Hume actually had such a problem as the formulator proposes. I should characterize the central theme of TEI as a concern with ‘Kant’s problem’, with the inevitable admission that Kant himself never faced the problem as I formulated it. ‘Kant’s problem’ is stated exactly in the middle of the text:
神圣将军
发表于 2025-3-25 00:57:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8627/862623/862623_20.png