avulsion 发表于 2025-3-23 10:10:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_11.pngLITHE 发表于 2025-3-23 15:01:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_12.png神圣在玷污 发表于 2025-3-23 19:22:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_13.png一再困扰 发表于 2025-3-23 22:13:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_14.png屈尊 发表于 2025-3-24 04:58:59
, ‘Personalities’ter quoted in ., has sometimes been taken as a generalized description of Romanticism itself, Coleridge was in fact responding to a specific debate about the place of ‘personalities’ in public discourse, and especially in periodical writing. In this essay, I will sketch the contours of that debate a使人烦燥 发表于 2025-3-24 08:29:37
Communal Reception, Mary Shelley, and the ‘, School’ of Criticismtte of characteristically Blackwoodian tics, tropes, and dogmas to draw upon. Even though at the time the magazine was but a few years old, it had developed so wide an audience and so distinctive a voice that Deacon could fully expect his readers to grasp and delight in the pitch-perfect tenor of hiOutwit 发表于 2025-3-24 13:39:31
Blackwoodian Allusion and the Culture of Miscellaneity first number set out intending to ‘examine the morality, the consistency, the composition of that Magazine, in regular order’. Regularity proved impossible, however: ‘the whole of these are frequently so mixed, so crowded in the same paragraph, that it is more than difficult to analyze and arrange执 发表于 2025-3-24 17:05:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_18.png圆柱 发表于 2025-3-24 20:34:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8318/831705/831705_19.png丰富 发表于 2025-3-24 23:30:13
Prosing Poetry: , and Generic Transposition, 1820–1840 even as it published articles and arguments that worked to fight off the monster of undifferentiated discourse. From the early . attacks on the Cockney poets launched by John Gibson Lockhart, William Maginn, and John Wilson, to the parodies and stimulating narratives about lyric poets exchanged by