SHOCK 发表于 2025-3-25 05:04:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_21.pngAggrandize 发表于 2025-3-25 07:52:08
The Critical Project in Schelling, Tillich, and GoodchildThomas Altizer begins his most recent “call to radical theology” with the following demand for “unthinking”:丰富 发表于 2025-3-25 14:22:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_23.png充气女 发表于 2025-3-25 18:50:31
Radical Theologies and Philosophieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/829270.jpgAnonymous 发表于 2025-3-25 20:41:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_25.png确保 发表于 2025-3-26 00:37:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_26.png天赋 发表于 2025-3-26 04:28:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_27.png后来 发表于 2025-3-26 11:16:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_28.png假装是你 发表于 2025-3-26 15:02:33
Retrieving the Radical Tillich978-1-137-37383-0Series ISSN 2634-663X Series E-ISSN 2634-6648腐烂 发表于 2025-3-26 17:22:52
Paul Tillich and the Death of Godand consider the deeper layers of his thought. It must show how Tillich unnecessarily restricts the opposition he posits in God between being and nonbeing to eternity instead of allowing the conflict to play itself out historically as it does for Altizer—the Hegel-inspired radical to whom Tillich co