irradicable
发表于 2025-3-23 10:58:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_11.png
FACT
发表于 2025-3-23 15:22:47
God Is a Symbol for Godns of the possibility of any radical theology whatsoever. But, of course, that would hardly be in the spirit of the many anti-foundationalist endeavors that go under the heading “radical theology.” My claim instead is a much more modest one—namely, that Tillich does an exemplary job of covering the
FOR
发表于 2025-3-23 19:24:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_13.png
勉励
发表于 2025-3-23 23:36:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_14.png
影响
发表于 2025-3-24 03:45:49
The Irrelevance and Relevance of the Radical, Impure Tillich to stand between alternative possibilities of existence, to be completely at home in neither and to take no definitive stand against either.”. In a world that often demands singularity, the boundary is a place of impurity: of being between and among options, claims, and possibilities. The modern qu
Ischemia
发表于 2025-3-24 10:34:58
Socialism’s Multitude: Tillich’s , and Resisting the US Imperiala hegemonic power after WWII. From this vantage point, the United States claimed and guarded the US dollar as global exchange currency, fought and endured “the Cold War,” and, with the fall of the Soviet Union and East European state socialism, rose to a sole superpower from the 1990s onward. It has
Osteoporosis
发表于 2025-3-24 14:32:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_17.png
Fsh238
发表于 2025-3-24 18:27:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_18.png
Gnrh670
发表于 2025-3-24 23:05:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_19.png
白杨
发表于 2025-3-25 02:07:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_20.png