irradicable 发表于 2025-3-23 10:58:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_11.pngFACT 发表于 2025-3-23 15:22:47
God Is a Symbol for Godns of the possibility of any radical theology whatsoever. But, of course, that would hardly be in the spirit of the many anti-foundationalist endeavors that go under the heading “radical theology.” My claim instead is a much more modest one—namely, that Tillich does an exemplary job of covering theFOR 发表于 2025-3-23 19:24:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_13.png勉励 发表于 2025-3-23 23:36:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_14.png影响 发表于 2025-3-24 03:45:49
The Irrelevance and Relevance of the Radical, Impure Tillich to stand between alternative possibilities of existence, to be completely at home in neither and to take no definitive stand against either.”. In a world that often demands singularity, the boundary is a place of impurity: of being between and among options, claims, and possibilities. The modern quIschemia 发表于 2025-3-24 10:34:58
Socialism’s Multitude: Tillich’s , and Resisting the US Imperiala hegemonic power after WWII. From this vantage point, the United States claimed and guarded the US dollar as global exchange currency, fought and endured “the Cold War,” and, with the fall of the Soviet Union and East European state socialism, rose to a sole superpower from the 1990s onward. It hasOsteoporosis 发表于 2025-3-24 14:32:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_17.pngFsh238 发表于 2025-3-24 18:27:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_18.pngGnrh670 发表于 2025-3-24 23:05:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_19.png白杨 发表于 2025-3-25 02:07:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829270/829270_20.png