Lipoprotein 发表于 2025-3-25 05:34:39
Retraction Matters978-3-031-66081-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292tenuous 发表于 2025-3-25 07:42:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829260/829260_22.png鸣叫 发表于 2025-3-25 13:54:14
Nevermind: On Retraction as a Speech Actformal account models the effect of a retraction on the context to restore the common ground to a prior state, computable from the conversational record. Our account also explains the status of speech acts that follow the target of retraction. Retractions are cognitively costly on our account, but, we argue, this is the right result.催眠药 发表于 2025-3-25 19:40:06
0166-6991 tures new contributions from internationally renowned schola.This book offers the first sustained investigation of the phenomenon of retraction - the “taking back” of the conventional or deontic effects of a previous speech act - bringing together issues and solutions from the semantics of perspecti四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-25 21:48:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829260/829260_25.pngAirtight 发表于 2025-3-26 00:49:46
Taste Predicates and Retraction Data: An Improved Frameworkstics. These debates have yielded many subtle and inventive analyses of PPT. There is, however, a crucial methodological question about PPT that remains underexplored: what sorts of . should be used in evaluating an account of PPT? In line with a fairly large body of recent work, we point out that s越自我 发表于 2025-3-26 04:40:17
Falsity and Retraction: New Experimental Data on Epistemic Modalstences and uses this evidence as part of a broader argument against assessment relativism. It follows other papers that reach similar conclusions, such as that of Knobe and Yalcin (Semant Pragmat 7:1–21, 2014). Its results were achieved simultaneously and independently of the more recent work of KneFretful 发表于 2025-3-26 09:46:18
Relativism and Retraction: The Case Is Not Yet Losta variety of natural language expressions (predicates of taste, epistemic modals, moral and aesthetic claims etc.) in support of their view. The main consideration offered is that relativism can, while rival views cannot, account for this phenomenon. For some of those leading the charge, retraction或者发神韵 发表于 2025-3-26 13:41:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829260/829260_29.pngOTHER 发表于 2025-3-26 19:57:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829260/829260_30.png