EVICT
发表于 2025-3-30 09:57:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_51.png
Demulcent
发表于 2025-3-30 14:02:56
Commentary on Bird’s Paperd the Neo-Kantian view of Kuhn regarding world change (p. 36). In this commentary, I would like to pursue this line because it appears to be fruitful. Let me begin by first pinning down the contrast that is at issue.
Licentious
发表于 2025-3-30 16:58:31
Nonsense and Paradigm Changeg of Wittgenstein’s undertaking. From this side, the paper attempts showing that Wittgenstein’s early philosophy in the . can be understood as a major (perhaps the most) radical “paradigm shift” for the whole “disciplinary matrix” of philosophy. This paradigm change in philosophy is of a very partic
Inelasticity
发表于 2025-3-30 22:38:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_54.png
危险
发表于 2025-3-31 04:16:07
An Instrumental Bayesianism Meets the History of Scienceity of approaches and fluidity characteristic of theoretical work in real, living fields of scientific inquiry. It functions as a limited, post hoc formalism, and thus should be considered as one tool applicable for describing “normal science”. It should be noted that, in this discussion, while I en
ferment
发表于 2025-3-31 06:35:54
Commentary on “is Science Cumulative? a Physicist Viewpoint”, by Bernard d’Espagnatis that Kuhn’s thesis of noncumulativity pertains only to . scientific change. Only scientific revolutions bring about the radical changes in the cognitive fabric of scientific theories that give rise to non-cumulativity. By contrast, normal science is fully cumulative. Normal science is likened by
irritation
发表于 2025-3-31 12:55:12
Some Optimism for the Pessimistferential continuity of apparently referentially stable theoretical terms such as “electron”, in the face of significant change in our favoured scientific theories..The PMI is one of the most potent weapons in the intellectual arsenal of opponents of scientific realism (Stanford, 2003). Scientific r
Badger
发表于 2025-3-31 14:48:58
Harré Needs No Realismthe year but I don’t remember the issue of laws of nature coming up again – instead we talked a lot about the differences between model-theoretic and scientific models. I learnt a lot from those discussions (as from discussions with others at Oxford), but what was even more memorable and long-lastin
生命
发表于 2025-3-31 19:48:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_59.png
BROW
发表于 2025-4-1 00:52:43
Book 2008t the international colloquium, “Repenser l’évaluation comparative des théories scientifiques: stabilités, ruptures, incommensurabilités?” organized by Léna Soler and Paul Hoyningen-Huene at the University of Nancy, France, in June 2004. Each paper is followed by a critical comment, which either rep