阻挠
发表于 2025-3-25 04:22:56
Commentary on “From One Version to the Other: Intra-Theoretical Change”, by Anouk Barberousseg into account an interesting feature in the evolution of physics – the process of making explicit the content and meaning of a physical theory – Barberousse tries to develop an important topic, namely the central difficulty one encounters when comparing scientific theories and considering scientifi
Ondines-curse
发表于 2025-3-25 08:48:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_22.png
Rodent
发表于 2025-3-25 12:55:24
An Instrumental Bayesianism Meets the History of Sciences Bayesian approach to analyzing science by studying how far it may be used to model real scientific fields and by locating areas requiring further philosophical work or generalization. Most broadly, Dr. Hartmann’s paper seeks to find a consistent way to explain and characterize the continuity and c
apiary
发表于 2025-3-25 18:30:02
Is Science Cumulative? a Physicist Viewpointally remain useful, the statement made by some epistemologists that science is not cumulative is difficult to understand. Some might try to relate its validity to a “principle” according to which, to be “really scientific” a theory must be such that the set of its basic laws does not explicitly refe
外面
发表于 2025-3-25 21:57:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_25.png
exercise
发表于 2025-3-26 03:14:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_26.png
木质
发表于 2025-3-26 07:32:39
Some Optimism for the Pessimistt for the referential continuity of the term “electron”, in the face of a history of significant change in our favoured theories about electrons. Nola argues that we can reliably induce that future scientific theories will continue to refer to many of the same entities in the world, such as the elec
alliance
发表于 2025-3-26 10:54:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_28.png
languid
发表于 2025-3-26 14:14:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829130/829130_29.png
Etymology
发表于 2025-3-26 20:00:33
Reasons for Choosing Among Readings of Equipollent Theoriesical plausibility. This move is not only defensible theoretically, but evident in the thinking of the scientific community since the seventeenth century. It is also intended to show how conceiving of science as based on iconic model building provides the resources needed to make judgments of ontolog