散布
发表于 2025-3-23 12:18:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828866/828866_11.png
聪明
发表于 2025-3-23 15:00:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828866/828866_12.png
Cantankerous
发表于 2025-3-23 18:41:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828866/828866_13.png
戏服
发表于 2025-3-24 01:51:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828866/828866_14.png
禁止,切断
发表于 2025-3-24 05:37:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828866/828866_15.png
原告
发表于 2025-3-24 06:53:58
The Sense of an Ending now altogether more contentious. For its advocates it is something worth cherishing because the virtues of its classics are self-evident. Writing of sociology’s classics, Gianfranco Poggi (1996: 39–40) declared that ‘their unique intellectual texture the magnitude of their scholarly achieveme
名词
发表于 2025-3-24 13:55:33
In Pursuit of Identity: Fragmentation, Conflict and Crisisscipline. An important related theme throughout this section is the way sociology tends to diminish the significance of the past, underestimate the importance of tradition, and thereby skew the way it conceives its classics. The classic, I shall argue, links the past and the present; it discloses ho
fodlder
发表于 2025-3-24 17:09:31
Contested Identity: Sociology in Postmodern Timesl power of self-determination. The work of Beck and Giddens was regarded as more moderate in tone but still shared the assumption that tradition was a restriction on agency, something negative from which the individual would naturally seek to escape.
Painstaking
发表于 2025-3-24 22:05:15
The Hermeneutic Approachction to it. It is the weakness of these concepts that they rarely acknowledge the gap between what they describe and the relation they have to what preceded them. They disregard the creativity of tradition, habit, custom, and so forth, ignoring the idea that the past and the present interpenetrate
钳子
发表于 2025-3-25 00:35:52
Canons and Their Discontentss conceal the collusion classic authors have with the repressive hierarchies of their time. In ‘Why is Classical Theory Classical?’, R.W. Connell (1997: 1511–1157) uses the principles of social constructionism to present a particularly powerful challenge to the validity of the sociological canon, ar