使成核
发表于 2025-3-30 08:19:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_51.png
填满
发表于 2025-3-30 13:55:20
Jan Smedslund and Psychologic: The Problem of Psychologism and the Nature of Languageressed by Smedslund himself, has not been thoroughly appreciated. I argue that it is crucial to understanding a project like the psychologic. Second, I place Smedslund’s work in a historical perspective derived from the debates surrounding psychologism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth cent
exclamation
发表于 2025-3-30 17:00:57
The Linguistic Fore-Structure of Psychological Explanationts do not test hypotheses about the relationship between psychological process and behavior because any failure to verify would defy cultural understanding. Here I propose that the intelligibility of psychological explanations does not rest so much on cultural understandings as tautological language
obtuse
发表于 2025-3-31 00:40:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_54.png
Cupping
发表于 2025-3-31 01:43:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_55.png
Serenity
发表于 2025-3-31 07:35:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_56.png
争议的苹果
发表于 2025-3-31 11:40:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_57.png
婚姻生活
发表于 2025-3-31 16:13:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_58.png
影响带来
发表于 2025-3-31 18:26:06
Extending Smedslund’s Psycho-Logic System into a Social Theorycial theory and from the so-called linguistic turn in the social sciences. It will be argued that developing a conceptual system for psychology as Smedslund did makes only sense if it is embedded in a broader context of social theory since psychological phenomena cannot be separated from the social
多样
发表于 2025-3-31 23:01:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8287/828619/828619_60.png