ARGOT
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:20
书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0827444<br><br> <br><br>
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-21 22:12:41
Narrow Representational Content,h this debate from subtly different debates. I then lay out the main argument for externalism. The argument’s crucial premise is . (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the same representational content while differing in truth value. If CFT is true, internalism is false and externalism is true
暴露他抗议
发表于 2025-3-22 04:24:27
Narrow Content and Propositions,inherit the contents of—propositions. Second, necessarily, propositions have truth values, and they have these truth values absolutely. Thus, there are no . propositions. It is commonly recognized that these two tenets jointly entail Content Fixes Truth (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the
ALIEN
发表于 2025-3-22 04:46:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_4.png
infelicitous
发表于 2025-3-22 09:55:30
Why We Cannot Think about Nonexistents,itutively involves a thinker’s standing in a relation to an object of thought, then it is impossible to think about nonexistents. I present an argument that is clearly valid. I then argue that, to make sense of the validity of this argument, we must accept that thinking constitutively involves a rel
鞭打
发表于 2025-3-22 13:16:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_6.png
隐藏
发表于 2025-3-22 18:27:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_7.png
Chemotherapy
发表于 2025-3-23 00:07:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_8.png
LASH
发表于 2025-3-23 04:30:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_9.png
变量
发表于 2025-3-23 08:38:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8275/827444/827444_10.png