不能平庸
发表于 2025-3-21 16:20:12
书目名称Religious Language影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Religious Language读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0826730<br><br> <br><br>
ARM
发表于 2025-3-21 23:01:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_2.png
造反,叛乱
发表于 2025-3-22 02:40:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_3.png
multiply
发表于 2025-3-22 06:48:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_4.png
护航舰
发表于 2025-3-22 10:59:54
Overview: An original and accessible discussion of the nature of religious language that draws on the latest research in the philosophy of language. The historical background to research on religious language is also explored and connections are made with both Continental Philosophy and Theology.978-1-349-44138-9978-1-137-03320-8
细查
发表于 2025-3-22 12:55:51
ReferenceIn the discussion of apophatic theology in Chapter 2, we saw that a serious objection could be raised against the theory on the basis of two assumptions:
Postulate
发表于 2025-3-22 19:05:56
Religious Internalismng argument available in favour of either of the two principal kinds of attitude theory, expressivism and moderate attitude theory. This is the argument from the motivational force of religious belief. As we will see, it is related to an argument sketched by Berkeley on the motivational effects of faith that we considered in Chapter 3.
Charade
发表于 2025-3-22 23:13:59
Metaphor and Analogyain theories (two of which, John Searle’s implicature theory and Max Black’s interaction theory, are closely connected). As we will see in the later evaluation of IT, one of the most serious objections to the theory is that there does not seem to be a plausible theory of metaphor available on which IT can be defended.
Myocyte
发表于 2025-3-23 05:12:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_9.png
expository
发表于 2025-3-23 09:31:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_10.png