祝贺
发表于 2025-3-26 22:53:10
Michael Scott959, p .... ). Some of the manuscripts were written over a period of days, with sequential paging, with the actual dates indicated. Full citations are given in the bibliography. I am grateful to the Harvard University Archives for permission to quote from these materials, and to Bridgman‘s daughter,
Oversee
发表于 2025-3-27 01:30:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_32.png
魅力
发表于 2025-3-27 09:05:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_33.png
critique
发表于 2025-3-27 13:21:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_34.png
intrude
发表于 2025-3-27 16:20:44
Against Expressivismxpressivism has answers for some of the objections raised against it, it encounters some very serious problems that render it an unacceptable theory; moderate attitude theory, in contrast, escapes relatively unscathed. In each section of this chapter I look at a different objection.
摆动
发表于 2025-3-27 21:16:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_36.png
hermitage
发表于 2025-3-28 01:47:53
Introductionaving the ‘semantic’ or ‘propositional’ content — ., and in stating it a speaker conventionally expresses the belief that God is omnipotent. More generally, according to face value theory, the interpretation of religious language does not diverge from our interpretation of other descriptive areas of
就职
发表于 2025-3-28 05:38:10
Apophaticsility of God. Sometimes called ‘mystical’ or ‘apophatic’ theology, in contrast with the dominant ‘cataphatic’ approach, this tradition — or at least one influential strand of it — motivates an account of religious language that diverges from the face value theory. Apophatic theology, or ‘apophatics’
Somber
发表于 2025-3-28 07:40:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826730/826730_39.png
considerable
发表于 2025-3-28 10:38:45
Braithwaite and Verificationismous language. However, his theory proceeds from a largely uncritical acceptance of the verificationist theory of meaning endorsed by the logical positivists. This theory, popularised by A. J. Ayer in . (1936; 2nd edition 1946), was argued by him to show that religious . — his term for indicative sen