咽下 发表于 2025-3-23 10:18:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825992/825992_11.png

最低点 发表于 2025-3-23 14:09:42

Introductory RemarksWe begin with characterizations of philosophy, philosophy of religion, and religion. Having noted the weaknesses of standard accounts of religion, we settle on a modification of the account provided in Atran and Norenzayan (2004). We conclude with some observations about worldviews, atheism, and competing conceptions of philosophy.

Cumbersome 发表于 2025-3-23 21:18:01

Disagreement, Opinion and Expertisefacts of religious disagreement — irreligion, pluralism, exclusivism — we consider some more unsettling questions that are raised to us by our disagreement with those who are at least as smart, well-informed, reflective and attentive as we are when it comes to questions about religion. We argue that

令人作呕 发表于 2025-3-23 23:20:46

Belief, Faith and Evidence in one’s religious believing if one appropriately apportions one’s beliefs according to the evidence that one has. Others suppose that reasonable religious belief can be a matter of faith, that is of belief in the absence of sufficient evidence to justify the belief in question. Yet others believe

FLIP 发表于 2025-3-24 05:11:00

Debate, Reason and Argumenttanding dogma, we argue that alleged proofs of the characteristic claims of worldviews — including religious worldviews — are almost always unsuccessful (and, when they are successful, they typically achieve much less than proponents of the alleged proofs might have hoped for).

宠爱 发表于 2025-3-24 07:36:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825992/825992_16.png

BADGE 发表于 2025-3-24 11:36:58

Mind, Body and Spirit consider ways in which this naturalistic account might be challenged by proponents of religious worldviews, and the significance of these challenges for other metaphysical and ethical issues, including cosmic justice and life after death.

宣誓书 发表于 2025-3-24 17:51:42

Cause, Freedom and Responsibilityand fate that are prompted by reflections upon causality, chance and determinism. Finally, we consider arguments against both compatibilism and incompatibilism. We conclude that there is considerable overlap between the range of naturalist opinion and the range of religious opinion on these matters.

Eulogy 发表于 2025-3-24 20:25:45

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825992/825992_19.png

不幸的人 发表于 2025-3-25 01:49:56

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825992/825992_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Reinventing Philosophy of Religion; An Opinionated Intro Graham Oppy Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limit