粗鲁性质
发表于 2025-3-26 21:45:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_31.png
Harass
发表于 2025-3-27 04:18:35
The Case of Pragma-Dialecticse way in which argumentation is conducted in communicative practice but also a normative dimension pertaining to the norms of reasonableness that are employed when argumentation is judged for its quality and possible flaws are detected.
谷物
发表于 2025-3-27 09:09:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_33.png
evince
发表于 2025-3-27 10:33:51
The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics and dialectic as a fully-fledged academic discipline, considered rhetoric to be the ‘counterpart’ (.) of dialectic, so that the distinction reflects primarily a division of labour among students of argumentation, the two intellectual enterprises have over time and by irregular stages grown apart.
臭了生气
发表于 2025-3-27 16:16:33
From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Develo associate themselves with and do, we considered argumentation of great intellectual, social and practical significance. A systematic reflection on the tools enabling an adequate production, analysis and evaluation of argumentation seemed therefore crucial to us.
placebo-effect
发表于 2025-3-27 20:50:55
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialecticsry the relationship between the two, captured in Aristotle’s term ., is lost. According to van Eemeren, this relationship, which he considers crucial to a full-fledged argumentation theory, has been recovered in extended pragma-dialectics with the help of the theoretical notion of ‘strategic manoeuvring.’
GRACE
发表于 2025-3-28 00:17:39
Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspectivematic and utilitarian arguments can be given for its intersubjective validity. Thus, conventional validity is promoted for a code of conduct for discussants who want to resolve their disputes reasonably by way of a critical discussion.
Horizon
发表于 2025-3-28 04:06:24
Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmaticsentral question can therefore be specified as: how can it be made clear that the study of argumentation can be constructively viewed as being part of (normative) pragmatics by pointing out that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation benefits in various respects significantly from taking a speech act perspective?
Host142
发表于 2025-3-28 07:59:46
Yunfeng Dai,Guiping Zhu,Bin Cui,Yi Zhuresence of smoke by analyzing color and texture features of moving objects, segmented with background subtraction. The proposal embodies some novelties: first the temporal behavior of the smoke is modeled by a Mixture of Gaussians (MoG ) of the energy variation in the wavelet domain. The MoG takes i
我们的面粉
发表于 2025-3-28 14:02:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_40.png