不舒服
发表于 2025-3-25 06:45:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_21.png
世俗
发表于 2025-3-25 09:39:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_22.png
aphasia
发表于 2025-3-25 14:14:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_23.png
抵消
发表于 2025-3-25 18:46:37
The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussionng the quality of argumentative practices: the ways in which people in argumentative reality justify their views in communication with others and respond to the justifications of views given by others.
暖昧关系
发表于 2025-3-25 22:16:14
Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspectiveion. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and anthropological perspectives don’t meet these criteria, but a critical perspective does. It is
构想
发表于 2025-3-26 03:37:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_26.png
CHANT
发表于 2025-3-26 05:38:40
A Procedural View of Critical Reasonablenessical approach to argumentation. Such a rationale may, in our view, be supposed to have two complementary dimensions. First, there is the dimension of ‘problem validity,’ a criterion having to do with the effectiveness of an approach, which has become the single touchstone in the logical perspective
Influx
发表于 2025-3-26 09:42:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822464/822464_28.png
改革运动
发表于 2025-3-26 14:12:29
The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussionsthe opinion that is under discussion. If the participants are co-operative, this means that they are prepared to externalize their position with regard to the opinion and to advance argumentation for or against it. In this article, which is a condensed translation of an article originally published
abolish
发表于 2025-3-26 18:49:31
Book 2015ion theory. It discusses van Eemeren’s views on the study of argumentation; the approach to argumentation adopted in pragma-dialectics; pragma-dialectical perspectives on the dialectical and pragmatic dimensions of argumentative discourse; the notion of strategic maneuvering; the pragma-dialectical