温室
发表于 2025-3-30 11:56:45
Discussion: A Mistake in Dynamic Coherence Arguments? strengthened "sequentialized" notion of dynamic coherence is explored here. It so happens that even on the strengthened standards for a Dutch book, the classic dynamic coherence argument for conditioning still goes through.
compel
发表于 2025-3-30 15:45:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822060/822060_52.png
缓和
发表于 2025-3-30 18:49:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822060/822060_53.png
AROMA
发表于 2025-3-30 21:08:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822060/822060_54.png
因无茶而冷淡
发表于 2025-3-31 03:01:46
Probable Knowledgege to age with the scope of what we take ourselves to know; and philosophers who are impressed with this flux sometimes set themselves the problem of explaining how we can get along, knowing as little as we do. For knowledge is sure, and there seems to be little we can be sure of outside logic and m
解冻
发表于 2025-3-31 06:08:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822060/822060_56.png
Explicate
发表于 2025-3-31 09:44:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822060/822060_57.png
galley
发表于 2025-3-31 14:53:02
Why I am not a Bayesianes not purport to be, of a deductive kind. A confirmation theory should serve as a critical and explanatory instrument quite as much as do theories of deductive inference. Any successful confirmation theory should, for example, reveal the structure and fallacies, if any, in Newton’s argument for uni