cyanosis 发表于 2025-3-25 05:23:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9448-0Critchley and mystical anarchism; Infinitely Demanding; anti-cosmic; ethics of exposure; ethics of proje未完成 发表于 2025-3-25 11:05:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750465/750465_22.pnggait-cycle 发表于 2025-3-25 12:27:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750465/750465_23.pngmediocrity 发表于 2025-3-25 17:37:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750465/750465_24.pngGLIDE 发表于 2025-3-25 21:16:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750465/750465_25.png不舒服 发表于 2025-3-26 00:26:02
Exposures and Projections,ting to our inevitable disappointment when faced with this limit of such shareability suggests, I contend, the availability of a dissensual core to our understandings of citizenship. I conclude that democratic citizenship is not grounded in a consensual being-in-common but in a dissensual event of intangible hapticity.Meander 发表于 2025-3-26 07:04:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750465/750465_27.png背信 发表于 2025-3-26 08:34:06
Simon Critchleyy disorders by Ron Kessler and colleagues, which provides an authoritative survey of anxiety disorder incidence, prevalence, and risk factors. This is comp- mented by a comprehensive review of 978-3-642-26375-0978-3-642-02912-7Series ISSN 1866-3370 Series E-ISSN 1866-3389很像弓] 发表于 2025-3-26 13:01:16
Alistair Welchman disorder, including both traditional and novel therapeutics, as well as non-pharmacological treatments. It offers both researchers and clinicians key insights into this devastating disorder.978-3-642-26599-0978-3-642-15757-8Series ISSN 1866-3370 Series E-ISSN 1866-3389有限 发表于 2025-3-26 17:32:11
Politics, Anthropology and Religion,e few. I argue that the mystical thought of Porete, on Critchley’s reading, is hostile to embodied life, to materiality in general, not motivated by communistic concerns and tainted by the elitism that haunts mystical discourse. This questions the possible significance ‘Mystical Anarchism’ can have within an anarchist politics.