Stricture
发表于 2025-3-23 10:14:29
,Bach and Neale on “What Is Said”,is the content of her intention . a property of the utterance itself. He sees no theoretical role for utterance meanings. In contrast, my theory is committed to utterances, and their expression-tokens, having meanings. I present three reasons for this position. (i) The most basic task for a theory o
终止
发表于 2025-3-23 17:49:00
Confusion of the Metaphysics of Meaning with the Epistemology of Interpretation,doing so is not a “mere confusion”; the topics are “inextricably linked”. I argue that their reasons for thinking this are flawed. (A) At most they demonstrate an evidential impact of epistemic on metaphysical determination. (B) There is no reason to believe that what a hearer can figure out about w
Congestion
发表于 2025-3-23 18:35:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705256/705256_13.png
等待
发表于 2025-3-23 22:25:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705256/705256_14.png
原谅
发表于 2025-3-24 05:25:48
,Saturation and Pragmatism’s Challenge,processes have an appropriately . place in cognitive lives. This requirement has not been met, nor has there been any psycholinguistic attempt to meet it. According to the Developmental Objection it is unlikely to be met. According to the Occamist Objection, we should then prefer a semantic explanat
OVERT
发表于 2025-3-24 07:11:11
,Polysemy and Pragmatism’s Challenge,ous phenomena, PRAG, is that a pragmatic modification of meaning typically plays a role in constituting messages. This generates a “psychological-reality requirement”: pragmatic explanation is committed to there being regular subconscious psychological processes in speakers and hearers that are appr
Cryptic
发表于 2025-3-24 13:26:22
Sub-Sententials: Pragmatics or Semantics?,l, of such speech is actually syntactically elliptical – and hence should be treated semantically, rather than pragmatically. Stainton objects that there is no such ellipsis with the sub-sententials in question. My semantics-oriented approach does not make the syntactic-ellipsis claim and so is not
Obverse
发表于 2025-3-24 17:08:06
Book 2021semantic Bias”, or other such strategies for “meaning denialism”. From this novel perspective, the striking examples of context relativity that motivate contextualists and pragmatists typically exemplify semantic rather than pragmatic properties. In particular, polysemous phenomena should typically
孤僻
发表于 2025-3-24 20:52:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705256/705256_19.png
Immunotherapy
发表于 2025-3-25 01:04:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705256/705256_20.png