别炫耀
发表于 2025-3-27 00:12:20
The Argument from Suffering II,y are morally reprehensible. And, since the argument’s conclusion is that God does not exist, that conclusion is at odds with the envisaged premise; and so it may appear that the argument from suffering is self-undermining.
Mnemonics
发表于 2025-3-27 04:55:09
Theistic Phenomenalism: An Alternative Causal Theory of Perception, is, or should be taken to be, equivalent to the former conclusion. An affirmative answer to this question is made tempting by the argument of Chapter 6 that I cannot justifiably conclude that a mind-independent desk is the cause of my seeming to see my desk.
空洞
发表于 2025-3-27 06:02:28
Book 1996s causally connected to his creation. Dore defends a version of the ontological argument and refutes the atheistic argument from suffering. He argues that only God can account for the overridingness of morality. He also treats ethical supernaturalism as a type of ethical attitude theory, showing how
牵连
发表于 2025-3-27 10:23:16
Book 1996n scientific explanation, theistic explanation of the empirical universe can get a foothold. His method is to adopt and defend a version of theistic (Berkeley-like) phenomenalism and, in that connection, a pragmatic-instrumentalist interpretation of scientific theories.
Subjugate
发表于 2025-3-27 14:07:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7012/701160/701160_35.png
DUCE
发表于 2025-3-27 21:29:04
How to Apply the Ideal Observer Theory: The Controversy over Artificial Contraception and Abortion,ter view can, paradoxically, be used to undermine some widespread contemporary theistic beliefs about precisely what it is that God favors and disfavors. The alleged wrongness of artificial contraception and abortion are cases in point.
Myocyte
发表于 2025-3-28 01:03:07
9楼
modest
发表于 2025-3-28 04:05:38
9楼
Barter
发表于 2025-3-28 08:12:51
9楼
幸福愉悦感
发表于 2025-3-28 13:49:59
10楼