空隙
发表于 2025-3-21 17:09:42
书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0668100<br><br> <br><br>
Ingrained
发表于 2025-3-21 22:42:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90796-3Normative reasons; Divine command; metanormativity; Practical Reason; philosophical concept
Palatial
发表于 2025-3-22 02:50:53
978-3-030-08103-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
束缚
发表于 2025-3-22 06:13:42
Normative Reasons and Theism978-3-319-90796-3Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184
充气女
发表于 2025-3-22 09:20:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668100/668100_5.png
冥想后
发表于 2025-3-22 14:14:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668100/668100_6.png
IOTA
发表于 2025-3-22 20:00:10
Conclusion,rary debate can be said to be characterized by some classic symptoms of normative autism or mind-blindness, ranging from a failure to register the mental import of the terms it deploys to literalism where rational intuitions are concerned. Finally, I describe my own journey from mind-blindness to mind-sight where Reason is concerned.
消音器
发表于 2025-3-22 22:48:55
The Question,stion); (b) that normative reasons should not be conflated with explanatory reasons and/or motivational reasons; and finally (c) that there are three main kinds of normative reason: epistemic, instrumental and moral.
drusen
发表于 2025-3-23 02:10:46
Normativity,t talk of favoring relations should be interpreted metaphorically, is rejected on the grounds that it has no positive evidence in support of it, is of questionable coherence, and violates the principle of parsimony.
incite
发表于 2025-3-23 06:09:35
Unity,uitions of others (which would make no sense unless they were providing us insight into the same matter). Additionally, widespread convergence in the content of our rational intuitions, and the fact that the posit of a single mind is simpler than any multiple-bearer thesis, operates to make the unity thesis true beyond a reasonable doubt.