bronchiole 发表于 2025-3-26 21:35:22
Geras and Trotskyism,atic figure, admired his prescient analysis of the rise of Nazism, and admired Trotsky as a literary figure. Cowling argues that this was one of the weakest aspects of Geras’s work. If he had applied his technique of rigorous analysis and thorough theoretical research, he might perhaps have reachedanus928 发表于 2025-3-27 04:17:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_32.pngIndolent 发表于 2025-3-27 06:30:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_33.png寡头政治 发表于 2025-3-27 10:38:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_34.pngInexorable 发表于 2025-3-27 15:43:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_35.pngDedication 发表于 2025-3-27 21:29:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_36.pngpaltry 发表于 2025-3-27 23:04:51
Geras and Postmodernism 2: Richard Rorty, nature, and that Rorty implicitly uses assumptions about human nature in various ways. Cowling admires Geras’s extensive secondary reading on the Holocaust, which allows him to refute Rorty’s speculation that people helped Jews because of prior connections. Cowling argues that both Geras and RortyMAL 发表于 2025-3-28 03:57:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_38.png自制 发表于 2025-3-28 06:21:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_39.png条街道往前推 发表于 2025-3-28 10:48:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_40.png