bronchiole 发表于 2025-3-26 21:35:22

Geras and Trotskyism,atic figure, admired his prescient analysis of the rise of Nazism, and admired Trotsky as a literary figure. Cowling argues that this was one of the weakest aspects of Geras’s work. If he had applied his technique of rigorous analysis and thorough theoretical research, he might perhaps have reached

anus928 发表于 2025-3-27 04:17:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_32.png

Indolent 发表于 2025-3-27 06:30:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_33.png

寡头政治 发表于 2025-3-27 10:38:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_34.png

Inexorable 发表于 2025-3-27 15:43:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_35.png

Dedication 发表于 2025-3-27 21:29:19

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_36.png

paltry 发表于 2025-3-27 23:04:51

Geras and Postmodernism 2: Richard Rorty, nature, and that Rorty implicitly uses assumptions about human nature in various ways. Cowling admires Geras’s extensive secondary reading on the Holocaust, which allows him to refute Rorty’s speculation that people helped Jews because of prior connections. Cowling argues that both Geras and Rorty

MAL 发表于 2025-3-28 03:57:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_38.png

自制 发表于 2025-3-28 06:21:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_39.png

条街道往前推 发表于 2025-3-28 10:48:56

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights; Controversy and Anal Mark Cowling Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an