火花
发表于 2025-3-25 05:57:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_21.png
压碎
发表于 2025-3-25 09:21:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_22.png
Camouflage
发表于 2025-3-25 14:27:36
Mark Cowlingy, he was supremely conscious of not merely reflecting but, indeed, advancing the revolution in thought which, becoming critically self-aware of its liberating power, would radically challenge established ideas and institutions and determine the structure of values which continue to shape our lives
CHAFE
发表于 2025-3-25 19:18:37
Mark Cowlingms, promoting dialectic from relative obscurity to a more appropriate position at the forefront of Islamic legal studies. The author introduces and develops a dialectics-based analytical method for the study of pre-modern Islamic legal argumentation, examines parallels and divergences between Aristo
向外
发表于 2025-3-25 22:45:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_25.png
变白
发表于 2025-3-26 02:35:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_26.png
NADIR
发表于 2025-3-26 04:28:49
Mark Cowlingnd consuming use values through reference to the theoretical contributions of semiotics, but without denying the primacy of nature and the primacy of the material as the inalienable foundation of human communication. Here, we find an essential difference vis-à-vis a series of contemporary approaches
abysmal
发表于 2025-3-26 08:28:32
f Human Rights, and Hannah Arendt’s complaint that the idea human rights has made so little progress because its champions failed to get beyond the status of a society for the protection of animals, seems long dated. Hardly anyone today would say they are not concerned with the protection of Human R
Promotion
发表于 2025-3-26 15:01:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6681/668081/668081_29.png
Ptsd429
发表于 2025-3-26 17:24:22
The Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg,ocialism or barbarism?’, but Cowling argues that Geras should have said more about Luxemburg’s economic theory, which underpins this slogan. Geras discusses Luxemburg’s view of the period between the Russian Revolution of 1905 and that of 1917. He claims, which Cowling disputes, that Luxemburg came