Myosin 发表于 2025-3-28 18:14:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_41.png

Oligarchy 发表于 2025-3-28 20:18:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_42.png

言外之意 发表于 2025-3-29 01:18:31

Influences on Goodman’s Philosophyhave argued that Goodman’s semantics likewise led to a kind of solipsistic idealism. Goodman’s resemblance to James was not just in Goodman’s advocacy of pluralism, for like the pragmatists’ unwillingness to choose sides between the materialists and the idealists, Goodman was unwilling to choose sid

凝乳 发表于 2025-3-29 05:27:30

The Effects of Goodman’s Epistemology on his Terminology/Conceptsare not “natural” but are instead delineated by our own social agreements that have codified themselves into the logic of semantics. For Goodman, there is no “natural” way of seeing things nor are there any natural kinds.

吵闹 发表于 2025-3-29 08:48:00

Goodman’s Expression as Referencens of the notion and word “property” are ones Goodman must avoid if he is to explain expression solely in terms of extensionalist reference, which is the genus encompassing all the separate species of denotation, representation, expression, and exemplification. Representation and expression are the

牵连 发表于 2025-3-29 15:28:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_46.png

策略 发表于 2025-3-29 17:59:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_47.png
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Nominalism and Its Aftermath: The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman; Dena Shottenkirk Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Aesth