600
发表于 2025-3-26 21:19:35
The Effects of Goodman’s Nominalist Constructionalism on his Epistemologyularities could be projected into the future and which regularities would not be projected still remained - hence, Goodman’s “new” riddle. The answer to the problem of the projection of predicates is also constructionalist in that we are free to re-make our world; inductive practices, which are the
Excise
发表于 2025-3-27 02:33:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_32.png
一再烦扰
发表于 2025-3-27 08:55:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_33.png
时代错误
发表于 2025-3-27 09:43:46
Goodman’s Expression as Referenceoid such commitments, and hence, his view that aesthetics is referential functioning within a semantic account that posits only individuals is consistent. Thus the distinction between what the art object represents and what it expresses was not, for Goodman, a difference between the kinds of thing r
Obedient
发表于 2025-3-27 16:45:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_35.png
mortuary
发表于 2025-3-27 21:33:02
Aesthetics as a Branch of Epistemologytic. Not, of course, expecting an essentialist definition that could distinguish between the two, Goodman rather looks for the differing ways that the symbol processes might reveal themselves. The “symptoms” of the aesthetic are: syntactic density, semantic density, syntactic repleteness, and exempl
STALE
发表于 2025-3-28 00:49:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_37.png
Expediency
发表于 2025-3-28 04:53:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_38.png
致命
发表于 2025-3-28 06:24:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666818/666818_39.png
刚开始
发表于 2025-3-28 12:52:53
The Consequences of Goodman’s Nominalism for his Terminologyork, and was part of a more general attempt to move away from the perceived vagueness of metaphysics and to instead give non-intensionalist accounts of reality. Fictive references are forbidden as they are analogous to the null set, and both are at odds with Goodman’s nominalism and extensionalism.