Lice692
发表于 2025-3-25 06:17:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6615/661489/661489_21.png
FAR
发表于 2025-3-25 09:26:28
Introductory Chapter, some of the measures implemented to take care of the respective needs of the issue areas may conflict, creating severe political restrictions on the pace, scope and depth of the regional process to set an Arctic agenda of timeliness and adequacy. Second, and partly contrary to the first, the assump
Intractable
发表于 2025-3-25 14:46:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6615/661489/661489_23.png
Debrief
发表于 2025-3-25 16:24:46
Environment in the U.S. Discourse on Security: The Case of the Missing Arctic Waters,c, and social security; and (4) in all directions where responsibility, and I would add the need for cooperation, in ensuring security is concerned.. A formidable array of private analysts, NGOs, foundations, think tanks, and officials as well as a few political leaders have started to generate and,
在前面
发表于 2025-3-25 23:46:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6615/661489/661489_25.png
Figate
发表于 2025-3-26 00:12:32
Book 1999f the team of authors. The professional input and thorough work ‘behind the scene‘ done by Liv Astrid Sverdrup, Researcher at FNI at an early stage of the project, has been invaluable. Senior Consultant Kjell Moe at the Norwegian Polar Institute also provided valuable comments and improvements to th
lobster
发表于 2025-3-26 06:24:13
National Security and International Environmental Cooperation in the Arctic — the Case of the Northe
PHONE
发表于 2025-3-26 11:52:49
Willy Østreng (Director of the Fridtjof Nansen Ins
长矛
发表于 2025-3-26 14:55:23
been regarded as mutually opposed. His conception is basically Lockean, in founding universals on the causal efficacy of particulars, conceived of as entities with powers. Unlike Locke, however, he does not regard particulars (or thin particulars, in the terminology of the latter part of his paper)
流浪
发表于 2025-3-26 17:23:33
Willy Østrengbeen regarded as mutually opposed. His conception is basically Lockean, in founding universals on the causal efficacy of particulars, conceived of as entities with powers. Unlike Locke, however, he does not regard particulars (or thin particulars, in the terminology of the latter part of his paper)