Annihilate
发表于 2025-3-21 19:52:22
书目名称Modal Justification via Theories影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Modal Justification via Theories读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0635697<br><br> <br><br>
inferno
发表于 2025-3-21 23:44:16
978-3-319-84089-5Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Mystic
发表于 2025-3-22 01:05:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6357/635697/635697_3.png
Diskectomy
发表于 2025-3-22 05:49:05
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/635697.jpg
发怨言
发表于 2025-3-22 08:46:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6357/635697/635697_5.png
大看台
发表于 2025-3-22 14:43:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6357/635697/635697_6.png
Kindle
发表于 2025-3-22 19:47:15
Book 2017dal claim if and only if (a) she justifiably believes a theory according to which that claim is true, (b) she believes that claim on the basis of that theory, and (c) she has no defeaters for her belief in that claim. The book has two parts. In the first, the author motivates TEM, sets out the view
malapropism
发表于 2025-3-22 22:41:57
0166-6991in detail. As it turns out, TEM offers a better route to modal skepticism than the one that van Inwagen provides. But rather than being a liability, the auth978-3-319-84089-5978-3-319-49127-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
Breach
发表于 2025-3-23 03:19:31
Book 2017 be justified in believing. This raises a question about TEM‘s relationship to Peter van Inwagen‘s modal skepticism, which the author explores in detail. As it turns out, TEM offers a better route to modal skepticism than the one that van Inwagen provides. But rather than being a liability, the auth
看法等
发表于 2025-3-23 05:49:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6357/635697/635697_10.png