Boldfaced 发表于 2025-3-21 17:01:23
书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0632431<br><br> <br><br>Corporeal 发表于 2025-3-21 20:34:38
Methods of Legal Reasoning978-1-4020-4939-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315和音 发表于 2025-3-22 03:45:17
Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz BrozekThe only book that covers four major philosophies of legal reasoning (logic, analysis, argumentation, hermeneutics).Shows the philosophical basis for any theory of legal reasoning.Reports interdiscipl阻塞 发表于 2025-3-22 06:38:51
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/632431.jpg抚育 发表于 2025-3-22 09:26:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6325/632431/632431_5.png壕沟 发表于 2025-3-22 14:34:11
Controversy over Legal Method in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,extinguish 发表于 2025-3-22 18:59:49
Methods of Legal Reasoning from a Postmodern Perspective,Amendment 发表于 2025-3-23 01:14:36
Book 2006ical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward tHangar 发表于 2025-3-23 01:26:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6325/632431/632431_9.pngmicronized 发表于 2025-3-23 07:50:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6325/632431/632431_10.png