Tractable
发表于 2025-3-28 15:31:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6283/628230/628230_41.png
闹剧
发表于 2025-3-28 22:10:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6283/628230/628230_42.png
xanthelasma
发表于 2025-3-29 01:30:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6283/628230/628230_43.png
DEVIL
发表于 2025-3-29 03:09:00
The Ranking Regime and the Production of Knowledge: Implications for Academiation of knowledge within academia and for faculty evaluation. We argue that the ranking regime affects the production and evaluation of knowledge by promoting individualism, standardization, commodification, and homogenization. We offer policy and practice implications as well as directions for future research.
diabetes
发表于 2025-3-29 09:07:01
The Influence of Rankings and Incentive Systems on Academic Publishing in South African Universitiesate, and deliberately to respond to the question of what it means to be ‘excellent’. Drawing upon institutional documents in the public domain, this paper shows how significantly this tension animates the decisions that institutions are making about their research and publication policies and practices.
CHAFE
发表于 2025-3-29 14:39:55
The Shifting Sands of Academic Output: University of Cape Town Research Output in Education and Soci the questions being asked, on publishing internationally in accredited journals. The increasing pressure to satisfy performance management criteria required for promotion and monetary reward has driven researchers to be more individualistic in their approach to research output.
Diastole
发表于 2025-3-29 16:36:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6283/628230/628230_47.png
斥责
发表于 2025-3-29 23:03:49
n indexes as measures of productivity, and analyzes alternatThis book examines the quality assessment movement in academic scholarship, as globalization prompts a search for global measures of university services and output. It gauges productivity in terms of universal publication metrics, and cons
得罪人
发表于 2025-3-30 02:46:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6283/628230/628230_49.png
平淡而无味
发表于 2025-3-30 04:54:21
Book 2021es and output. It gauges productivity in terms of universal publication metrics, and considers ranking and research productivity from a comparative perspective. The book considers the use of the “impact factor” as a gauge of publication value, noting that this less important in countries lacking ce