Adrenaline
发表于 2025-3-27 00:49:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624976/624976_31.png
参考书目
发表于 2025-3-27 02:01:48
Book 2019 not incompatible, and an analysis of their relation helps one to better understand both. Establishing a transatlantic theoretical dialogue, this book discusses similarities and differences between these philosophies. It is an interdisciplinary study that brings together philosophy, American and Eur
关心
发表于 2025-3-27 07:54:31
Book 2019ely postmetaphysical culture, the attempt to elucidate the dialectics of Marxism and pragmatism is a good starting point. The book offers detailed discussions of Sidney Hook, Georg Lukács, Theodor W. Adorno, Fredric Jameson, W.E.B. Du Bois, John Dewey, Richard Rorty, and Jacques Rancière. .
separate
发表于 2025-3-27 11:38:47
Early Encounters: Sidney Hook, Richard J. Bernstein, and George Novack,oxymoronic to George Novack, it was anathema. Novack’s . versus . (1975) is a severe critique of Dewey’s pragmatism. Throughout his text, Novack maintains that pragmatism—which he reads as a middle-class, liberal philosophy—and Marxism are strictly incompatible.
AVID
发表于 2025-3-27 14:14:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624976/624976_35.png
candle
发表于 2025-3-27 20:50:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624976/624976_36.png
就职
发表于 2025-3-28 01:05:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624976/624976_37.png
CLEAR
发表于 2025-3-28 04:16:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624976/624976_38.png
逗留
发表于 2025-3-28 09:48:42
,From Finding to Making: Jacques Rancière, Richard Rorty, and the Antifoundationalist Story of Progrty’s scenario of a poeticized culture and the Rancièrian aesthetic regime of art. Moreover, Schulenberg calls attention to some important differences between Rorty and Rancière’s versions of anti-Platonism.
Missile
发表于 2025-3-28 13:48:38
Stories of Emancipation and the Idea of Creative Praxis: Karl Marx and John Dewey,rg compares Marx’s idea of “praktische, menschlich-sinnliche Tätigkeit” and creative praxis with that of John Dewey as he develops in . (1934). For both philosophers, the human subject’s creative praxis is of the utmost importance. It is this parallel that adds to one’s understanding of the relation between Marxism and pragmatism.