notice
发表于 2025-3-25 05:17:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624913/624913_21.png
内部
发表于 2025-3-25 10:43:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624913/624913_22.png
Constant
发表于 2025-3-25 12:36:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624913/624913_23.png
招致
发表于 2025-3-25 19:31:02
Reading Strategies for Hegel, Marx, and Laozind Laozi). It will be explained that the reading strategy for Laozi is directly opposed to that of Marx because of their divergent approaches: Marx’s works are historicist, essentialist, and humanist and operate within the science of concepts (in a qualified sense), Laozi is anti-historicist, anti-e
Ophthalmoscope
发表于 2025-3-25 21:20:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624913/624913_25.png
清澈
发表于 2025-3-26 04:08:01
Hegel’s Metaphilosophy of Idealism account of Hegel’s idealism is essential for this as the controversy that will unfold between Hegel and Laozi in the next chapter will mainly concern idealism. The chapter surveys recent literature on Hegel’s Idealist conception of philosophy to give a clear explanation of his idealism. It will be
etidronate
发表于 2025-3-26 06:49:58
Hegel’s Interpretation of Laozienuine dialogue between the two, dialogue is circumscribed by Laozi’s rejection of Hegel’s idealist conception of philosophy. The chapter begins by going over some hermeneutic issues involved in Hegel’s own reading of Laozi, situating it in Hegel’s cultural/historical context and Hegel’s idealist/co
Irremediable
发表于 2025-3-26 10:27:29
An Anti-conceptualist Reconstruction of Laozihy and how. The interpretation of Hegel’s idealism explained in previous chapters will be used to show that Laozi’s approach represents a way of thinking philosophically which Hegel’s philosophy, despite some points of contact, can neither accommodate nor refute. A Laozi will be constructed who is n
机构
发表于 2025-3-26 14:04:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624913/624913_29.png
内疚
发表于 2025-3-26 20:10:24
Praxis: Scientific Discursive Employment of Conceptsach’s criticism to scientifically employ Hegel’s logic. Hegel’s hypostatization of the concept was scientifically progressive in that it led to the science of concepts. Marx will be read as correcting Hegel’s hypostatization by giving Hegel’s abstract concepts the content of concrete history. Marx w