SEED 发表于 2025-3-26 21:22:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_31.pnglinguistics 发表于 2025-3-27 01:23:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_32.png轻浮思想 发表于 2025-3-27 05:41:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_33.pngDOTE 发表于 2025-3-27 11:47:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_34.png创造性 发表于 2025-3-27 15:13:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_35.pnglegitimate 发表于 2025-3-27 19:25:38
The Machine Analogy in Medicine: A Comparative Approach to Leibniz and His Contemporaries,ermine whether the description of bodies as machines has to do only with a lexicalization that does not in fact imply any particular ontological or epistemological thesis, or whether, on the contrary, this description involves certain doctrinal positions that remain to be specified.certain 发表于 2025-3-28 00:18:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_37.png极少 发表于 2025-3-28 03:46:10
,Continuity or Discontinuity? Some Remarks on Leibniz’s Concepts of “Substantia Vivens” and “Organisiner-grained changes. After a decade of intense theoretical debate on the nature of corporeal substances, on organisms, on machines of nature, Nunziante wishes to sketch a historical picture that accounts in a coherent manner for the development of Leibniz’s thought.Amorous 发表于 2025-3-28 09:49:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_39.pngHAVOC 发表于 2025-3-28 12:04:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_40.png