考博
发表于 2025-3-25 05:29:46
Introduction, of the natural philosophy of G. W. Leibniz. The theme of the colloquium was the very controversial question of the role and meaning of the concepts of corporeal substance and natural machine in Leibniz’s metaphysics. As scholars have come to terms with the fact that the wide range of Leibniz’s writ
散布
发表于 2025-3-25 09:40:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_22.png
图表证明
发表于 2025-3-25 14:32:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_23.png
用肘
发表于 2025-3-25 18:58:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_24.png
BOLUS
发表于 2025-3-25 21:03:30
Leibniz on Artificial and Natural Machines: Or What It Means to Remain a Machine to the Least of Itg things. Nachtomy argues that this distinction has considerable consequences for Leibniz’s metaphysics. Leibniz insists that natural machines have something substantial – soul or form – that makes them one and the same thing in the least of their parts. This characterization constitutes the main di
entitle
发表于 2025-3-26 03:57:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_26.png
山顶可休息
发表于 2025-3-26 08:03:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_27.png
Isthmus
发表于 2025-3-26 12:11:39
Sennert and Leibniz on Animate Atoms,n the writings of Daniel Sennert (1572–1637) and those of Leibniz. For example, both Sennert and the early Leibniz accepted the Lutheran doctrine of traduction of souls. While Blank agrees with the overall framework of Arthur’s interpretation, he argues that there are also some real points of diverg
Rustproof
发表于 2025-3-26 13:22:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_29.png
craving
发表于 2025-3-26 19:33:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6209/620809/620809_30.png