弄污
发表于 2025-3-25 03:20:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_21.png
NICE
发表于 2025-3-25 11:19:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_22.png
magnanimity
发表于 2025-3-25 11:42:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_23.png
有法律效应
发表于 2025-3-25 16:13:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_24.png
高贵领导
发表于 2025-3-25 23:41:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_25.png
手段
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_26.png
arboretum
发表于 2025-3-26 05:32:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_27.png
ABIDE
发表于 2025-3-26 10:44:00
Sovereignty and Sewage,—upon themselves. I want to suggest, in rebuttal, that medieval cities were not sordid because people wanted them that way; that, in fact, medieval persons thought a great deal about the conditions of town life, and were unceasing in their attempts to achieve clear sightlines, rational planning, cle
heckle
发表于 2025-3-26 14:16:47
,Lydgate’s Worst Poem,tself.” . Having spent a good deal of my time reading and thinking about Lydgate, I began to ponder the lavenders poem and to wonder why he really wrote it. Could the standard explanation be the real one? It seemed unlikely to me that the same poet responsible for the sheer literary complexity of hi
debunk
发表于 2025-3-26 19:00:41
Lydgate, Location, and the Poetics of Exemption,cently overlooked, and are now at the center of some of the most interesting critical attention being paid to Lydgate. . This is at least partly because they position the poet in his most significant role for our post-New Historicist moment, that of the negotiator of power and patronage.