affect
发表于 2025-3-23 11:58:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_11.png
在前面
发表于 2025-3-23 15:53:41
Lydgate, Lovelich, and London Letters,y focusing on the material, critics can set aside the rhetoric of apology when venturing beyond the recognized literary stylists. In the case of Lydgate, materialism challenges the very concept of mediocrity that often clouds understanding of his work and of the fifteenth century generally. An appro
不爱防注射
发表于 2025-3-23 20:36:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_13.png
demote
发表于 2025-3-24 01:21:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_14.png
真
发表于 2025-3-24 04:25:38
,After Word Lydgate’s Refrain: The Open When,s critique, but to an embrace of the very pathological traits in Lydgate’s writing that Pearsall identified wittily and eloquently. These traits, of course, are only pathological when considered against the force of the powerful and only partly suppressed adoption of the normativity of a high modern
VEIL
发表于 2025-3-24 06:59:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_16.png
LATHE
发表于 2025-3-24 12:59:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_17.png
giggle
发表于 2025-3-24 15:53:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_18.png
phlegm
发表于 2025-3-24 21:59:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5892/589181/589181_19.png
RAGE
发表于 2025-3-25 02:55:34
Michelle R. Warrencted them, while others saw opportunities in them which they eagerly reached out to take. The profession’s response was not homogeneous nor, it should be stated, is it here suggested that the state or capital were completely united behind these changes. It seems reasonable to suppose that elements o